Wow, harsh words.
Regardless, it is a cartoon where some of the characters are wearing clothes - while others 'don't'. The clothes will emphasize that other characters are wearing nothing but their furs, scales, etc. Characters with shells might get away with it.
I'm telling you now, while there's still time for adjustments.
Former Discord User, StickyTheMoron, OSC Animator, and other shizz
I'm sadly stuck with the Name "Bradberry124" as that will be my Newgrounds alias from now on, I also speak Spanish and A bit of German and Japanese
Male
Object Show Animator
Idk
Puerto Rico
Joined on 1/30/23
- Level:
- 6
- Exp Points:
- 382 / 400
- Exp Rank:
- > 100,000
- Vote Power:
- 4.79 votes
- Rank:
- Civilian
- Global Rank:
- > 100,000
- Blams:
- 0
- Saves:
- 14
- B/P Bonus:
- 0%
- Whistle:
- Normal
- Medals:
- 4
Comments
Bruv my friend designed it like that cuz it’s supposed to be Like a 90’s cartoon
'I don't doubt that' and I do not know why you sound so angry.
All I am saying is: Out of the 8 characters presented one is an animal, 4 humanoids are naked, 3 are wearing clothes. If those without clothes exist within the same universe, they are established as temporarily naked/nudists to the audience.
It would not be a problem if they were all pantsless - but that's not the design you presented. It's all about establishing a narrative.
For better understanding:
Imagine Character A going into a store, picking up some items and then leaving. All well and good, but if Character B in the same scene then walks up to the counter, pulls out a purse and pays for their goods in front of the camera, then Character A is established as a thief in the eyes of the audience. Even Character A has a credit score with that shop, the shop owner would have to be established as taking notice of which items they took.
If Character A is still browsing by the time Character B and the camera are leaving the shop then they are 'not' established as a thief.
I hope that was understandable to you. Because I'm afraid I cannot make it any clearer...
@Yatsufusa Brubhhhhh its a fashion choice some cats dont wear pants and some do, deal with it
@Yatsufusa its really not the same.... theyre animals, not people. So I would imagine wearing pants is optional as a fashion choice. Whats even worse than sounding angry is sounding nitpicky, and you are really sounding like that. Sheesh
@porsy I have said all that I could in an attempt to help you. Best of luck.
@Yatsufusa best of luck in what?? Not being a thick headed perverse moron???
@porsy I don't want to fight with you, but please watch your tone. At no point in this entire conversation have I been aggressive towards either of you and I think it is not too much to ask that you extend me the same courtesy.
"Best of luck with your animation." is what I meant and I think that should have been pretty obvious.
@Yatsufusa Bruh what??????????? this argument is not about my animation its about how anthropomorphic characters not wearing pants ISNT them being nudists. And no its not obvious you should have been clearer. And thanks
Yatsufusa
Mini-feedback: The characters with pants will make the other characters appear as nudists. ;)
Bradberry124
What the fuck, it’s a cartoon, are you a dumbass